24/04/2024
A mistake we make in the democratic system is believing that, or stepping aside so near all channels are open once a democratic election has been reached. There is more involved in the consciousness and operations of society that we have built to protect us from the vulnerability and possible manipulations of the democratic process. Though the concept of democracy itself as well as bully and under the counter tactics are often employed to override this.
There is a reason that we have centered international law in the protection of humanity, rather than mankind as a whole. We have a long world history of infiltration’s of our governments and religious mentalities turning our systems and national resources to serve against freedom, the civil populations, environment and humanity.
Democratic election and generating a volume of seeming or manipulated public approval doesn’t give written license to rescind social and environmental protection laws and approve projects that are heading us to unrecoverable Authoritarian rule, class division, famine, social and planetary environmental collapse.
Accelerating deforestation, interfering with aquifers and drying inland rivers, although becoming a world trend due to approvals being passed through within our world governing systems flags a major concern. The effects that this can have on water cycles and world precipitation and therefore food production needs to be taken into account. We are already experiencing water shortages, accelerated deforestation and species extinction yet the approvals continue to be ushered through. The thing is here, we blame ‘The Government’. But these are individual and conglomerate decisions and directives being whittled up within the government. But due to a societal misconception believing that once these directives have been emplaced, that It Is the government, this then offers our entire national resource as a shield for an activity that may well be serving against the best interests of the populations, living environment, and humanity. If they then take this, or push it one step further, it calibrates our government and it’s available resources as a persecution centre. That’s what we’re all pissed off with. It isn’t the government. Government is a necessary body. It is how the government and national resource is being calibrated by those operating within it. I had a case where I had a call from the hospital. Now this lady, with medical news that I needed wouldn’t tell me who she was or where she was calling from until I told her who I was. Literally reversing etiquette into entrapment. It’s become quite the trend. With all the scam calls these days, it seems, apart from being rude and unprofessional, an approach that just shouldn’t be adopted within a government department. When I was growing up I was taught, when calling someone on the telephone, to first introduce myself, if work etc related, to say where I was calling from, then ask to whom I wish to speak. Most of us were. It’s basic courtesy, etiquette and manners that humanity has taught us. But with further investigation, I found that this entrapment template had been made policy by management.
After WW2, efforts to maneuver our police systems towards a no accountability zone without external oversight you think would raise some flags of concern. In NSW, Australia, in addition to the above we’ve also experienced an increase of public interference style policing including a massive increase of public strip searches. Turning our police against society, or management decisions to generate hatred towards them isn’t open for democratic process. Welcome to the manipulation of social volumes, and the unintelligent current approach in the war on drugs, war against the free choice of reproductive rights and the war against freely consensual adult sexuality. Notice how the latter is being pushed beyond simply achieving equal rights, and into wielding rights shielding a path into something grotesque. This then manifests a natural social repulsion, collapsing us back into a condition of loosing our rights while increasing hate crime. All by public ‘democratic’ social opinion of course.
We had a situation here where live music in NSW was under fire. Like Sydney’s live music scene was all but destroyed. Not entirely, just the buds of life. Things have got a little better, but now we have a major problem with music festivals closing down. Base expenses are being artificially increased, and as a result festivals are being priced out of the market. That’s aside from the draconian style police presence that this over inflation of cost is paying for, also turning people away. Now I have spent some time at music festivals. For someone who had been socially reserved, these festivals have given me a new experience and involvement of life and social existence. As well providing grounds for new, and existing artists. I would come home, my body loose and feeling rejuvenated, my mind free of stress and carrying the joy of having met and socialised with new people. Truly, I found festivals a means to break down my social inhibitions and woes of life. But now, although they can’t close them down, as seems to have been the motive of actions against Sydney’s live music industry, what they have done is increase the base costs of legislated requirements such as over the top, intimidating police presence. I’ve got to say, I’ve been to a few festivals where the cops have been around in an assimilating presence, and I’ve felt better for it. But armed guards at the gate searching our cars, and large squads standing over the dance floor with a licence to arrest or fine people for some weed or lsd, seriously piss off. They say it’s for our own safety, but this is how the police end up with derogative terminology and hatred against them. Do you think that management decisions creating these unnecessary social interference situations that are making people hate police is safe for society ? Problem is, in saying this it leaves us vulnerable to counter puppet plays to reinforce these draconian directives. Again, an unmonitored or non considered scenario where fabrication, media and manipulated democratic volumes can be harnessed to serve against humanity.
Now in NSW they have artificially increased the cost of this unwanted over police presence to hundreds of thousands of dollars. 90% higher than other states, though an attempt to set it as a precedence will probably arrive. Whats the actual wage cost here ? And do we need a dozen police officers standing at the entrance and the dance floor ? Like I said, I’ve seen police at festivals talking with people and it’s been cool. Great, thanks guys. But these management requirements, same as the phone etiquette mentioned above, is putting society and civilisation in harms way. Then there’s the increase of public liability, probably because we aren’t allowed pill testing. I’m all for the policing of the drug networks. Yes, please, Police harmful and physically addictive substances, there are some horrid things coming out. An FBI agent lost his son to drugs unknowingly laced with fentanyl. Now why would you spend money to lace drugs, even weed with something like fentanyl that is known to easily cause OD ? This isn’t drug crime. But the blanket unintelligent war on drugs leads us into a veil that believes that it is.
We have a situation in Australia where previous federal funding was approved to pump industrial waste into the middle of Australia largest underground water reserve, The Great Artesian Basin. Now on the paper work to approve this project, all the boxes are sort of ticked. But as one of the available articles on this points out. We have empty oil wells. So what reason would anyone approve and fund pumping and dumping industrial waste into a water reserve ? We have environmental ministers with available teams for a reason. Here’s something I wrote earlier.
In Australia we have cases of sensitive waters and eco systems being threatened by misplaced mining and logging projects as well as industrial waste being dumped in inappropriate places. One I spoke about was one million tons of port waste to be dumped in the sanctuary of the Great Barrier Reef, another was radioactive waste to be held in prime agricultural lands in a country that is vastly desert. But another more recent was our own previous pm, who advertised gas as a green energy source, that would increase fraqing on large scale, secured federal funding to dump industrial waste into the great artesian basin. Now, to pass approvals it is being sprooked as food grade co2, but this doesn’t change the fact that it will effect the ph of the water turning it acidic. This in turn dissolves and damages the sandstone reservoir and is reported to likely cause a release of toxins and heavy metals into the water, such as arsenic and mercury. Now they are getting this through approvals by stating that this section of the aquifer is unlikely to be accessed. Isn’t part of humanity protecting the planet for future generations ? But as another article mentions, what reason would you pump any industrial waste or pollutant into a fresh water body, especially when we have empty oil wells ? Water of higher natural fluoride levels is being used elsewhere, and the water can be filtered to be made fully palatable. At least pumping it into empty oil wells may buy us a little time to come up with something better. At the moment, under Federal Funding granted by aforementioned pm, the plan is to liquify the carbon, then Truck one hundred and ten thousand litters by road per year 400km to then pump it into the middle of Australia’s largest aquifer and fresh water reserve. There is a lot of contradiction between the internally generated paperwork being used for approvals, and real world and independently gathered evidence against a project that defies common sense and is completely unnecessary as we have other options.
Same as electricity generation. We are being headed towards the nuclear steam engine despite limited material available for production. It’s a hell of a risk factor and scar to buy a temporary fix when we can develop and stick a corkscrew turbine in the ground running on a low boiling point material through a heat exchanger deep enough to offer the required temperature. Surely we could develop this in the time it takes to engineer, approve and build a nuclear power plant. There are also concerns with traditional geothermal electricity production that this concept removes.
Windmills seem like a fantastic idea, but we aren’t taking into consideration the harms of the Infra sound that they generate or the fact that they are killing birds for some reason, amongst other concerns. It’s fair enough that we may not have thought of this underground turbine system before, but dumping industrial waste on the Great Barrier Reef or in an aquifer is completely different. That’s straight out common sense and should be pulled up. Keep in mind, this aquifer project is being drawn up as a precedence model.
War continues to befall the Palestinian people with a rising civilian death toll, many of whom are children. Famine and genocide has been declared as imminent and the mass destruction of their city continues. There are concerns from within America that funding to the military sector maybe fueling a humanitarian crisis, with evidence that funding channels are breaching Federal American law, as reports of interference with humanitarian aid escalate.
America is up for federal election again. We have two distinct candidates. Something I hardly believed before I began writing in 2017, was that good politicians exist. But I’ve seen a few during the years since then. I’ve also learnt that there is more involved in good politicians doing good politics, such as dealing through locked senates, and manipulated social volumes. In observing what has occurred in the world over these few years, literally in situations that could erupt into world war 3, I think that we have been lucky to have the man of calm diplomacy that stands as American President today. A man that has a long history of supporting environmental protection and social support, despite considerable kick back and opposition of progress in these areas. I made a turn in my writing against this guy when they doubled down on the old style format war on, drugs, as it is such a critical component in the war against humanity. But as with many of us, we have learnt much, and the veil of the olde templates have become exposed. It takes a progressive leader embodying humility to recheck their stance on these things. Yes there are things with Israel, and the legal process here is coming to light. But it will take diplomacy. There are other candidates, but this is the man who America elected. Twice. Together these candidates cover such a broad range of humanity. You’re all in the same party. Is there a way that you can work together ? Between ya’s, you’ve got it covered.
The world as a whole has two very distinct paths. In our old templates, we have believed that it has been war against a nation, or war against a race, gender, class or religion. As our eyes open, perhaps we will see that it has always been a war against humanity. Regardless of race, gender, species, sexual orientation or religion.
ScribbleBook 